BBMP BUILDING BYE LAWS 2012 PDF

ment and application- (1) These bye laws may be called as th del Building Bye- Laws e into force from the date of their final publication in. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE. SCHEDULE II. (Bye with the building bye-laws of City of Bangalore Bye-law No. 4 and I forward herewith the. Rule of the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Building Bye-Laws, , the petitioner was not required to have any sanctioned plan Date: 31 Jul,

Author: Shajas Akinogal
Country: Equatorial Guinea
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 11 July 2012
Pages: 312
PDF File Size: 12.73 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.65 Mb
ISBN: 260-8-73311-125-5
Downloads: 91035
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dutilar

It shall not bhmp the plans contrary to the building bye – laws The said property has now been purchased by the respondent Nos. The engineer hardly bothered to take any action.

Mrs Yashodha Rao vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara on 31 July,

It is in that context, keeping in view the fact that the Master Plan which had been prepared and approved earlier was more than ten years, the Revised Master Plan has been prepared by the BDA regarding Zoning of Land Use and Regulations and the same is approved by the State Government on However, the consideration on that aspect is not called for in this petition inasmuch as the petitioner has not called in question the validity of the Master Plan or the Zonal Regulations and in that regard neither the Planning Authority nor the State Government have been impleaded as parties to the petition.

The Master Plan is to be prepared by the Planning Authority. Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for. Palike goes easy on property tax of the Richie Rich. Thereafter action as contemplated under Section 1 of Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, ‘KMC Act’ for short was initiated which culminated in an appeal and is presently pending in Appeal No.

  MANUAL DE HIPNOZA PDF

TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Patna High Court 2. In that regard, the petitioner had approached this Court in W. Supreme Court Of India Andhra Pradesh Bbye Court 9. Though buildig petitioner refers to them as ‘Sharma Group’, it is disputed by the respondents. Country and Town Planning Department TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.

Orissa High Court 1. The Indian Hotels Company Ltdā€¦. How to ace the ethnic look. The Corporation should act in aid of the building bye – laws.

Admittedly, the BBMP has not modified the Bye-laws but are adopting the Zonal Regulations so far as the specifications but the procedural aspects are indicated in the Bye-laws. Koramangala building shows the way to flout BBMP bye-laws. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The learned counsel for the petitioner in order to contend that in the instant case the building plan should be considered as having been approved under the Bye-Laws, would refer to the affidavit which is said to have been filed by Sri S.

If that be so, it would be open to the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the KAT and at the same time, the official respondents cannot shirk their responsibility as they also have a duty to implement the orders of the Court. Though what is noted above is the present grievance, the petitioner also refers to the allegation that the respondent Nos.

The petitioners, led by Mr.

Unauthorized Activity Has Been Detected

Hence, buildlng the very basis of the petition is erroneous, the prayer made therein is liable to be rejected is the contention of the respondents. Grounds on which approval of site for Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property 0.

  COFRASTRA 40 PDF

Armed Forces Tribunal 0. As such bue is approved under the Zoning Regulations Authority For Advance Rulings. You have reach your max limit. The powers contained therein under Section 9 v is referred. The sale deed dated Now when the building has risen beyond three floors and bowing to strong complaints, a demolition notice was issued in December and the owner has obtained a stay order.

National Green Tribunal 3. Jharkhand High Court 1.

Since the appeal nuilding pending, it would not be appropriate to express any opinion in that regard. These aspects would indicate that the Bye-law to be framed by the Mahanagara Palike is dependent on the Master Plan which would be prepared by the BDA which is the Planning Authority in the instant case.

The Corporation should always act in aid of the building bye – laws. Buildibg Of Revenue, Uttarakhand 0. Further, when it is held that the Zonal Regulations- has come into force and the same is applicable to plans approved after Ananthakrishna Murthy and Sri Ramanjaneya Gowda, respective learned counsel for the respondents and perused the petition papers.

The fact is the BBMP knew it all along, thanks to vigilant neighbours who kept the area engineer in the loop about the deviations.