Home Rene Lourau Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Stock Image. Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Edition). QR code for Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Title, Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Contributor, René Lourau. Publisher, Nueva Imagen, Tercera, el cambio institucional ha sido no sólo continuo, sino inusualmente dicha teoría considera al individuo como la unidad básica de análisis y, por el otro, . “elemento objetivo del sistema jurídico” de Hauriou (Lourau, 9, 62).
|Published (Last):||4 March 2006|
|PDF File Size:||3.67 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.45 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
René Lourau – Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre
It puts on the scene everything and everyone who in writing emerges as participants, summoning them to contribute to the analysis through their speeches, practices or the bonds that the problematizations create. Paradoxes between the analysis and the criticism.
The fact precedes the action and perception of the individual. This article presents some analyses of intervention practices carried out in schools and tutorial councils, taking two references as methodological basis: The diary carries a certain hardness of instiucional and problematizing what we do, because it confronts a meritocratic formation based on the error-correctness present in the pedagogical processes sedimented by the academic and professional formation that since the nineteenth century constitutes us.
Intervention that is not given as an adjustment of the diary’s author in the professional practice his and his colleagues’but as a movement to think the fundamentals that led the practices: Education without a previous shape?
The protagonism of the author of the diary is in the conduct of something analisia may have been understood as a particular situation, an action of a professional or a team, but it becomes a social event and historically referenced, even when loaded with singularities, because it was the analysis of their own implications. Even an act conducted personally is crossed by norms, affections, conditions, circumstances that take the professional practice off the heroic scene.
In other words, the intervention must consider that the practices of the tutelary council are impregnated with the movements instituted by the public policies directed at children and adolescents, by institutions such as school, religion, developmental psychology and others, by legislation that affirms the protection of the juvenile population, among other forces that take place in the council’s daily life.
We do not judge, we put institycional into analysis. It is not a mechanical exercise, a factual record, but the construction of a look that does not precede the writing, involving itself in it, evidencing everything that moves it.
It never precedes our gaze, because it is the effect of it. Objectivity as a counterpoint to subjective production is the separation between act and affection, summoned in front of a record of something louurau, cold, technical, inconceivable when the ways of perceiving lead to the record written or not of an act.
Collective because it is the processes that constitute us, that are present and drive the perceptions fixed on paper. From this perspective, the exercise of writing problematizes how we affect ourselves, our strangeness and difficulties, allowing us to stir up the instituted.
When a mother is judged by both the school staff and the tutelary council for not being in time to pick up her children because she stayed home watching television, a certainty is given: Analyzing each perception, shuddering truths, is a bet in the understanding of the logics that sustains the practices read by our gaze, before judging their truth or qualifying the agreements.
Socioanalytic intervention as an internship practice. An epistemological movement that questions not the fact as a given and unquestionable reality, but the historical conditions of production of true knowledge that will define what the fact is and which effects it has.
The implication paradigm allows us to show the different forces present in the field of actuation, instrumentalizing the analysis of the place occupied by the specialist and, in this way, questions the verticalities of the logic that separates the subject that intervenes from the object of the intervention.
The process necessary to deconstruct the prisons of the instituted is long, demanding lokrau us the reinvention through practices institufional intervention to think what is fixed and naturalized in the world. The sense of objectivity opposed to that of subjectivity is fundamental to discriminate all that the mind creates, of what the mind must grasp and evidence.
The analysis can only be creative if it is free to circulate between possibilities not perceived or not summoned in the act of registration. The event emerges from the encounter between the references that constitute the subject and the ones in which our intervention is objectified.
Its wealth is not in teaching luorau do right or better, since the performance can always be another, since life is intensity and chance.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
It is not a matter of recording successes, mistakes and deviations, in a proposal of self-criticism, but of thinking that every practice is a production to be thought of not as an inevitable act, nor an act to be corrected, but as an event that occurs in an enchainment of meanings.
It should be said: The author as a protagonist The writing of a field diary from the perspective of institutional analysis is a collective practice, even when it is authorial.
Unstitucional lived experience that composes the writing does not necessarily match the one that occurred originally, because the thinking and feeling in the moment in which a record analisiis constructed allows to resign, in an analytical compass in which the author is not alone, but in a shared movement with all those who composed the scene and in the midst of their thoughts, feelings, values, conceptions, also put into question.
For this purpose, it operates with its own tools, among them the instituional analysis and the field diary.
In the face of the heterogeneity that characterizes the institutional work, the field diary carries out a relationship that has as a horizon the horizontality, the self-management. Criticism carries an intention of correction and adaptation.
ISNI Lourau, René ()
The experience is not a mistake or an accomplishment and makes us think, exchange ideas, lead a collective movement to build other possibilities. They enter into the game of thinking the people, with their affections and knowledge, not to deny what was done, but to denature it by overflowing unprecedented limits. Among them, the one taken as an archaeological meaning can help to think the work with the field diary, because it aims at the traces of historical and discursive novelties that seek the regularity of practices, distancing themselves from the concept of social fact – as proposed by Durkheim.
Concerned with the premise that the institutionalization of relationships legitimates their ways llurau functioning and, therefore, calls people to join them without questioning them, insyitucional authors propose both a conceptual analysis and a construction of techniques to subsidize a professional practice that makes the habits, the annoyances, the powerful silences and inwtitucional whispers, into tools of intervention. The field diary is a technical instrument that instjtucional an intervention in the reality in question by problematizing both what is called analysis and how it should be done.
For louaru twenty years we have been supervising internships in three distinct fields: The writing of lougau field diary from the perspective of institutional analysis is a collective practice, even when it is authorial. All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
The analysis, which is based on the socio-analytical references, requires an exercise of thinking about the problems, the implications, understanding how they constitute us and lead our action. Thus, to define a situation as a fact, to register it and to approach it in a certain way, all this is part of a certain historically constructed subjective production that composes the field of the political.
Shifting such a view, Michel Foucault proposes to understand relationships as an event, whose sense will not be to coerce people independently of their way of thinking and being, but by defining the effect produced by the bodies in action.
While the practices take the experiences into individual plans, the diary analyzes the relationships, questioning why the grandmother’s story deserves immediate credit and punitive effects on the mother. The analusis as a protagonist. Many scenes are not composed by speech, but by sensation, by feeling, by silence, by desire, and any element can participate. Under such a perspective it would be for the analyst to come to the fact, to recognize it, to register it, and then study it, as loufau body exposed in a laboratory.
Truth does not precede the act of registering, it is not exposed to be recorded, but it is constructed in the encounter with what becomes a fact, producing an ontology of the present, a crossed look by the genealogical and ethical perspective. Next, the mother comes to the board demanding the child back. In addition to being an institucuonal practice, the field diary is institcional for relationships because it produces events, by highlighting – with its densities and forms – what is recorded.
For the latter, every act-fact is llourau reality in movement, being made and embodied by the analysis.